A fictional animal character built around the themes âCool · Loyalty · Leaderâ.
Names and keywords describe fictional animal characters. They do not reveal a person's personality, habits, health, destiny or career suitability from their face.
These are normalized measurements used by WhatZoo algorithm 1.0. A profile must pass its gate before detail scores are compared.
eye slant above 1 + face aspect ratio above 1.35
eye slant above 1.5 · face aspect ratio above 1.4 · chin ratio above 0.16
Passing a gate does not guarantee the result. Up to three detail rules and the scores of other candidates are compared next.
| Face type | Required gate |
|---|---|
| Wolf | eye slant above 1 + face aspect ratio above 1.35 |
| Fox | chin ratio below 0.15 + eye slant above 1.8 |
| Leopard | eye slant above 1.5 + face aspect ratio above 1.35 |
Head tilt and expression change apparent eye slant. Camera height and head angle change face aspect ratio. Retest with a neutral, front-facing photo.
These rules classify appearance for entertainment; they do not scientifically diagnose personality or ability.
See the full 478-landmark methodologyDog requires downward eye slant. Wolf requires upward eye slant and a relatively long face. The same measurements cannot pass both sets of required conditions.
These values are invented for explanation, not real people or experiment results. Only two profiles are compared; this does not predict the final match. The full classifier compares all animals, uses detail rules alone if no strict candidate qualifies, and randomly resolves top-score ties.
Passing the required conditions earns one point, plus the number of detail matches. Detail matches for an ineligible profile are shown for reference, not as a strict candidate score. Scores are not probabilities or accuracy rates.
With an eye-slant value of â2, this example meets all dog rules but does not qualify for wolf.
A separate example uses eye slant 2, face ratio 1.42 and chin ratio 0.17. It meets all wolf rules. This is not a photo-change experiment.
See current examples of five tiers and how classification, compatibility and group tools use them. Tiers do not assess personality, ability or rarity.
Separate landmark estimates, metric calculations and animal selection, and understand why WhatZoo does not guarantee accuracy or personality predictions.
Understand the seven inputs, required gates, matched-rule counts, detail-only fallback and random selection among tied candidates.