A fictional animal character built around the themes “Smart · Cunning · Charm”.
Names and keywords describe fictional animal characters. They do not reveal a person's personality, habits, health, destiny or career suitability from their face.
These are normalized measurements used by WhatZoo algorithm 1.0. A profile must pass its gate before detail scores are compared.
chin ratio below 0.15 + eye slant above 1.8
eye slant above 2 · chin ratio below 0.14 · mouth-width ratio above 0.38
Passing a gate does not guarantee the result. Up to three detail rules and the scores of other candidates are compared next.
| Face type | Required gate |
|---|---|
| Fox | chin ratio below 0.15 + eye slant above 1.8 |
| Cat | eye slant above 2 + nose-width ratio below 0.15 |
| Wolf | eye slant above 1 + face aspect ratio above 1.35 |
A high or low camera changes the apparent chin ratio. Head tilt and expression change apparent eye slant. Retest with a neutral, front-facing photo.
These rules classify appearance for entertainment; they do not scientifically diagnose personality or ability.
See the full 478-landmark methodologyBoth use upward eye slant, but cat eligibility also uses nose width while fox eligibility uses chin length. A narrow nose and a short chin can qualify for both profiles.
These values are invented for explanation, not real people or experiment results. Only two profiles are compared; this does not predict the final match. The full classifier compares all animals, uses detail rules alone if no strict candidate qualifies, and randomly resolves top-score ties.
Passing the required conditions earns one point, plus the number of detail matches. Detail matches for an ineligible profile are shown for reference, not as a strict candidate score. Scores are not probabilities or accuracy rates.
Both profiles pass their required conditions and all three detail rules. They tie in this comparison; neither is a guaranteed final match.
Only the nose-width ratio changes to 0.15. Cat requires a value strictly below 0.15, so the boundary value excludes it. Fox conditions are unchanged.
See current examples of five tiers and how classification, compatibility and group tools use them. Tiers do not assess personality, ability or rarity.
Separate landmark estimates, metric calculations and animal selection, and understand why WhatZoo does not guarantee accuracy or personality predictions.
Understand the seven inputs, required gates, matched-rule counts, detail-only fallback and random selection among tied candidates.