Compare fox and cat gates and detail scores, with examples where both qualify or one is excluded.
Read rules rather than impressions
WhatZoo's fox and cat profiles both use eye slant, but combine it with different measurements. This comparison does not distinguish intelligence, aloofness or affection. Animal names identify app profiles.
The two rule sets
- Fox gate: chin ratio < 0.15 and eye slant > 1.8.
- Fox details: eye slant > 2, chin ratio < 0.14, mouth width ratio > 0.38.
- Cat gate: eye slant > 2 and nose width ratio < 0.15.
- Cat details: face aspect ratio < 1.38, eye slant > 1.5, nose width ratio < 0.13.
The current fox profile does not directly check face aspect ratio or eye size. “A long narrow face means fox” or “large eyes mean cat” therefore does not describe these rules. Eye slant is not an angle in degrees.
An example where both qualify
Use eye slant 2.2, chin ratio 0.13, mouth width ratio 0.4, nose width ratio 0.12 and face aspect ratio 1.32. Both profiles pass their gate and three details for 4 points. Their tied scores cannot select a unique result.
Change only nose width ratio to 0.15: cat fails its strictly-less-than-0.15 gate. Fox does not check nose width and retains 4 points here. Actual analysis also considers other profiles, so this does not guarantee fox as the final result.
Explore the encyclopedia
These are constructed inputs, not real user faces or statistics. The fox and cat entries show comparison tables and rules. Read the analysis guide for the detail-only pass when no gate qualifies and random selection among highest-score ties.
Fictional character concepts do not describe real personalities. Explore other types in the encyclopedia tour.